COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Stuttering Severity Instrument - Fourth Edition
Abbreviation: SSI-4
Points for Consideration:
Concerns: stuttering is highly variable across settings, contexts, points in time. Stuttering is very difficult to quantify and standardize.
Description of Tool:
The Stuttering Severity Instrument - Fourth Edition is a ClinRO and PerfO developed to measure stuttering severity in children aged greater than 2 years. It is composed of 4 subscales: Frequency, Duration, Physical concomitants and the Naturalness of the individual’s speech.
Other Related Tools (if applicable):
Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES™ Yaruss & Quesal, 2016).
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: MA or BA
Comment:
Based on the SSI developed in 1972
Year: 2009
Objective of Development:
To measure stuttering severity
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
+2 years (Stuttering)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms ; Nervous System Diseases
COA type:
Number of Items 4
Mode of Administration:
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: 15-20 min
Response Scales: 6,7,9-point Likert/Likert-type Scale Other: Numerical Rating Scale ranging from 1 "Highly natural sounding speech" to 9 "Highly unnatural sounding speech"
Summary of Scoring:
Available Scores:
Scores by items: Speech Naturalness ranging from 1 to 9
Other: Total score by summing frequency, duration and physical concomitants scores and then convert to percentile
Weighting:
No
Score direction:
Higher score: Higher severity
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period:
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: Yes
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: None identified
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified
Evidence of internal consistency:
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: None identified
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
None identified
Known-group validity:
None identified
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: Yes
Evidence of concurrent validity: None identified
Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Responder Thresholds:
None identified
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Riley GD. A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. J Speech Hear Disord. 1972 Aug;37(3):314-22
Abstract: https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/jshd.3703.314?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
PRO-ED website: https://www.proedinc.com/Products/13025/ssi4-stuttering-severity-instrument--fourth-edition.aspx
Other references
See (PubMed results)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22Stuttering%20Severity%20Instrument%22&sort=date
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Original language and translations
Original language:
English
Translations:
Arabic for Egypt
Persian for Iran
References of translations
Arabic for Egypt:
Khodeir MS. 'Exploring stuttering severity in the Egyptian Arabic speaking children who stutter: A correlation study of Bloodstein classification of stuttering severity and the stuttering severity instrument for children and Adults-Arabic Version'. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;125:38-43
Persian:
Tahmasebi N, Shafie B, Karimi H, Mazaheri M. A Persian-version of the stuttering severity instrument-version four (SSI-4): How the new additions to SSI-4 complement its stuttering severity score? J Commun Disord. 2018 Jul- Aug;74:1-9
Condition of use: copyright
Copyright:
Instrument copyrighted by PRO-ED
Conditions of use:
* With fees for commercial/pharmaceutical companies
* please order directly from the PRO-ED website: https://www.proedinc.com/Products/13025/ssi4-stuttering-severity-instrument--fourth-edition.aspx
Website
https://www.proedinc.com/Products/13025/ssi4-stuttering-severity-instrument--fourth-edition.aspx
Review copy
N/A