COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Sickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth
Abbreviation: SCPBI-Y
Points for Consideration:
None
Description of Tool:
The Sickle Cell Disease Pain Burden Interview-Youth (SCPBI-Y) is a 7-item multidimensional PRO developed to assess pain burden among children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Patients are asked to think about the last month when rating how many days they have experienced pain or impact on a 5-level scale "None", "A few", "Some", "Many", "Every". Higher scores represent higher pain burden.
Other Related Tools (if applicable):
None identified
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement
Comment:
None
Year: 2013
Objective of Development:
To assess pain burden among children and adolescents with sickle cell disease
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
Age range: 7-21 years (Anemia, Sickle Cell)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Children and adolescents with sickle cell disease
COA type: PRO
Number of Items 7
Mode of Administration: Interview administered to patients and their caregiver(s)
Data Collection Mode: Paper and pen administration
Time for Completion: 1-minute
Response Scales: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0="None", 1="A few", 2="Some", 3="Many", 4="Every"
Summary of Scoring:
Available scores: Global score ranging from 0 to 28
Weighting: No
Score Interpretation: Higher score=Higher pain burden
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period: Past month
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: None identified
Evidence of re-testing the final version: Yes
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified
Evidence of internal consistency: None identified
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Zempsky WT (2013)
Test-retest reliability
- Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.80; p<0.001
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame between the two administrations: 1 week
- Population/Disease: Youth with sickle cell disease aged 7-21 years; n=47
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Zempsky WT (2013)
-Correlation Coefficient used: Pearson's r. Reliability was 0.78, p<0.001.
-Population/Disease: n=40/129 youth with sickle cell disease aged 7-21 years
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Zempsky WT (2013)
Convergent validity
- Correlation coefficients used: Pearson's r
- Measures: SCPBI-Y, Children's Activity Limitations Interview-21 (CALI), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule- Child Version (PANAS), Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic 4.0
- Results: There were significantly moderate to strong relationships, in which higher scores on the SCPBI-Y (indicating higher pain burden) were related to increased activity limitations and poorer health-related quality of life as assessed by validated measures.
CALI: outpatient r=0.64 (p<.001); inpatient r=0.41 (p<.01); combined group r=0.54(p<.001)
PANAS-Negative: outpatient group r=0.49 (p<.001)
PedsQL: outpatient group r=-0.65 (p<.001); inpatient groups r=-0.61 (p<.001); combined group r=-0.66 (p<.001)
- Population/Disease: Youth with sickle cell disease aged 7-21, n=129
Zempsky WT (2013)
Construct validity
- Correlation coefficients used: Pearson's r
- Measures: SCPBI-Y
- Results: A positive relationship between higher pain burden and increased number of reported days of pain over the last four weeks for the outpatient group (n=56, r=0.73, p<.001).
- Population/Disease: Youth with sickle cell disease aged 7-21; n=56
Zempsky WT (2013)
Divergent validity
- Correlation coefficients used: Pearson's r
- Measures: SCPBI-Y; PANAS-Positive Affect
- Results: A significant and weak inverse relationship, in which higher pain burden on the SCPBI-Y was associated with less positive affect on the PANAS-Positive Affect in the outpatient group and no relationship in the inpatient group.
PANAS-Positive Affect: outpatient r=-0.28 (not significant), inpatient r=-0.08 (not significant), combined r=-0.31 (p<.01).
- Population/Disease: Youth with sickle cell disease aged 7-21; n=56
Known-group validity:
Zempsky WT (2013)
- Measure/Groups of patients: outpatient group (n=62) vs inpatient group (n=67); patients with severe Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) symptoms (n=29) vs non-severe symptoms of SCD (n=30).
- A priori hypotheses: It was expected that SCPBI-Y scores (indicating pain burden) would be greater in patients who were hospitalized for acute vaso-occlusive pain, when compared with outpatients at baseline status. Pain burden would be greater in patients with more severe disease than patients with milder disease.
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Yes
- Results: As hypothesized, patients in the inpatient group had significantly greater pain burden than patients in the outpatient group (t(127)=-5.12, P<.001). Patients with severe SCD reported significantly greater pain burden than patients who exhibited non-severe symptoms (t(57)=-3.52, P<.001)
- Population/Disease: Youth with sickle cell disease aged 7-21; n=129
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: Yes
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Responder Thresholds:
None identified
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Zempsky, W. T., O'Hara, E. A., Santanelli, J. P., Palermo, T. M., New, T., Smith-Whitley, K., & Casella, J. F. (2013). Validation of the sickle cell disease pain burden interview-youth. The journal of pain, 14(9), 975–982. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23701707/
Other references
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Yes
Original language and translations
Original language: English for the USA
References of translations
None identified
Condition of use: copyright
The SCPBI-Y is not copyrighted.
Website
None identified
Review copy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.007