COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity scale
Abbreviation: R-PAct
Points for Consideration:
Little psychometric data available but may be important as a disease-specific measure
Description of Tool:
The Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity scale is a PRO for adolescents aged 16 years and older which includes 18 tasks related to activities of daily living, ranging from combing hair to turn around in bed, to walk at a rapid speed, and run. Each task is rated as "0, unable to perform," "(1) able to perform, but with difficulty," and "(2) able to peforme without difficulty". Lower scores represent more disability.
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement
Year: 2013
Objective of Development:
To quantify the effects of Pompe disease on patient’s ability
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
16+ years (Glycogen Storage Disease Type II)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Nervous System Diseases; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
COA type:
Number of Items 18
Mode of Administration:
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: Not reported
Response Scales: 3-point verbal rating scale ranging from 0 "Unable to perform" to 2 "Able to perform without difficulty"
Summary of Scoring:
Available Scores:
Global score is a summed raw scored transformed to a linear 0-100 score
Weighting:
No
Score Interpretation:
Lower score = More disability
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period:
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: Yes
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: Yes
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: Yes
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
van der Beek (2013)
- Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): 0.95 (for patients' location)
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame or interval between the two administrations: 2-4 weeks
- Population/Disease: Patients with Pompe disease; n=44 age: 16+ years
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Not applicable
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Known-group validity:
van der Beek (2013)
1. Measure/Groups of patients: Manual muscle weakness testing using the Medical Research Council (MRC)
- A priori hypotheses: Not stated
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ICC
The R-PAct summed raw score was strongly correlated to the MRC sum score: 0.82 (p Not stated)
- Population/Disease: Patients with Pompe disease; n=186 age: 16+ years
KNown-groups validity:
2. Measure/Groups of patients: Mobility groups: Ambulant without walking devices: n=69; ambulant with walking devices: n=30; partial or permanent wheelchair use: n=87
A priori hypotheses: Not stated
Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
Results: ICC
The R-PAct summed raw score was significantly higher:
in patients ambulant without walking devices compared to other groups (all p<0.01)
in patients ambulant with walking devices compared to patients with partial use (p=0.03) and permanent use (p<0.01) of wheelchair
in patients with partial use of wheelchair compared to those with permanent use of wheelchair (p<0.01).
- Population/Disease: Patients with Pompe disease; n=186, age 16+ years
3. Measure/Groups of patients: Use of ventilatory support
No ventilation required : n=102
ventilation required : n=84
- A priori hypotheses: Not stated
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ICC
The R-PAct summed raw score was significantly lower in patients who needed ventilation: p<0.01
- Population/Disease: Patients with Pompe disease; n=186, age 16+ years
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: None identified
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Responder Thresholds
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
van der Beek NA, Hagemans ML, van der Ploeg AT, van Doorn PA, Merkies IS. The Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity (R-PAct) scale. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013 Mar;23(3):256-64
Full text article: https://www.nmd-journal.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0960-8966(12)00669-4
Other references
See (PubMed results)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=(r-pact%5BTitle%2FAbstract%5D)+AND+((%222012%22%5BDate+-+Publication%5D+%3A+%223000%22%5BDate+-+Publication%5D))&sort=
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Original language and translations
Original language:
Dutch for the Netherlands
Translations:
English
References of translations
None identified
Condition of use: copyright
Not reported
Website
Not reported
Review copy
List of items available in van der Beek et al, 2013 (Figure 2) (https://www.nmd-journal.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0960-8966(12)00669-4)