Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Version 2

COA At-a-Glance

Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population

Evidence of internal consistency

Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability

Evidence of concurrent validity

Evidence of known-groups validity

Evidence of ability to detect change over time

Evidence of responder thresholds

Inclusion of the COA in product labelling

Daily function
Fine motor function
Gross motor function

Overview

Instrument Name: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Version 2

Abbreviation: PDMS-2

Description of Tool:

The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Version 2 is a ClinRO + PerfO developed to assess gross and fine motor skills in children from birth through five years of age. It is composed of 249 items covering the following domains:
Reflexes (Re) (8 items)
Stationary (St) (30 items)
Locomotion (Lo) (89 items)
Object Manipulation (Ob) (24 items)
Grasping (Gr) (26 items)
Visual-Motor Integration (Vi) (72 items)

Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: MA or BA

Comment:

Adapted from the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale published in 1983

Year: 2000

Objective of Development:

To assess gross and fine motor skills in children from birth through five years of age

Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):

0-71 months (Developmental Disabilities)
Validated with children on the autistic spectrum, with cerebral palsy, receiving physical therapy for various diagNoses, and premature children and babies

Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:

Mental Disorders; Nervous System Diseases; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Cardiovascular Disease ; Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases; Eye Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Neoplasms; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Digestive System Diseases; Virus Diseases; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Wounds and Injuries; Respiratory Tract Diseases

COA type:

Number of Items 249 tests (the number of tests administered is specific of each child, depending on the age and the level of development)

Mode of Administration:

Data Collection Mode:

Time for Completion: 45 to 60 minutes for the entire assessment. Approximately 20 to 30 minutes for gross motor or fine motor assessments, respectively.

Response Scales: 3-point verbal rating scale ranging from 0 "unable to perform", 1 "partial performance", 2 "correct performance"

Summary of Scoring:

Available scores:
3 composite scores (Sum of standard scores are presented as percentiles, standard scores, and age equivalents. Score ranges were not reported.)
Gross Motor Quotient
Fine Motor Quotient
Total Motor Quotient

Cut-Off score for children with or without fine motor: 16th percentile, child is considered to have fine motor problems
Cut-Off score at risk and pre-term infants: 16th percentile for gross motor skills in infants at the 4 month age level

Weighting:
No

Score Interpretation:
Higher score= Better developed motor abilities


Content Validity

Evidence of Literature Review: None identified

Evidence of Instrument Review: None identified

Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes

Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified

Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified

Recall/Observation Period:

Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified

Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified

Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified

Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified

Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified

Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified

Evidence related to item selection: Yes

Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified


Reliability

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified

Test-retest Reliability (ICC):

Not applicable

Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):

None identified

Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: None identified


Validity

Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):

None identified

Known-group validity:

None identified

Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified

Evidence related to missing data: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified

Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified

Evidence of concurrent validity: None identified

Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified

Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified


Ability to Detect Change

Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):

None identified


Responder Thresholds

Responder Thresholds:

Wuang (2002)
- Population/Disease: Children with intellectual disabilities (n=141, aged 3-6 years)
- Method used: Anchor-based
- Results:
MDC: 7.6
MCID: 8.39

Evidence of responder thresholds: Yes


Reference(s) of development / validation

Folio MR, Fewell RR. PDMS-2 Peabody developmental motor scales second edition. Austin: PRO-ED Inc. 2000

Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody developmental motor scales and activity cards. DLM Teaching Resources; 1983


Other references

Wuang YP, Su CY, Huang MH. Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Jun;56(6):567-78
PubMed Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21988314/


Inclusion of the COA in product labelling

None identified


Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual


Original language and translations

Original: English

Translations:
Portuguese for Portugal
Portuguese for Brazil


References of translations

Brazilian:
Zanella LW, Valentini NC, Copetti F, Nobre GC. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Second Edition (PDMS-2): Reliability, content and construct validity evidence for Brazilian children. Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Apr;111:103871 (PubMed abstract)

Portuguese:
Saraiva L, Rodrigues LP, Cordovil R, Barreiros J. Motor profile of Portuguese preschool children on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: a cross-cultural study. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jun;34(6):1966-73 (PubMed abstract)


Authors and contact information

Contact:
Pearson Assessments (UK) (https://www.pearsonclinical.co.uk/ContactUs/ContactUs.aspx)

Pearson Assessment (USA)
19500 Bulverde Rd
San Antonio, TX 78259-3701
USA
Phone: 210-339-5328
E-mail: pharma-licensing@pearson.com


Website

Pearson websites:
UK (https://www.pearsonclinical.co.uk/AlliedHealth/PaediatricAssessments/Motor/PeabodyDevelopmentalMotorScalesSecondEdition(PDMS-2)/PeabodyDevelopmentalMotorScalesSecondEdition(PDMS-2).aspx)
USA (https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Motor-Sensory/Peabody-Developmental-Motor-Scales-%7C-Second-Edition/p/100000249.html)


Review copy

Please contact Pearson Assessment, Inc.