Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Bank - Strength Impact

COA At-a-Glance

Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population

Evidence of internal consistency

Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability

Evidence of concurrent validity

Evidence of known-groups validity

Evidence of ability to detect change over time

Evidence of responder thresholds

Inclusion of the COA in product labelling

Daily function
Gross motor function

Overview

Instrument Name: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Bank - Strength Impact

Abbreviation: PROMIS Pediatric Bank - Strength Impact

Points for Consideration:

Low number of publications

Description of Tool:

The PROMIS Pediatric Strength Impact scale is a PRO containing 12 items designed to assess a child's capacity to perform functional activities of daily living that require significant amount of muscle force generation.

Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement

Year: 2014

Objective of Development:

To assess a child's capacity to perform functional activities of daily living that require significant amount of muscle force generation

Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):

8-17 years (All)

Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:

Not reported

COA type:

Number of Items 12 items

Mode of Administration:

Data Collection Mode:

Time for Completion: Not reported

Response Scales: 5-point verbal rating scale ranging from 1 "No days" to 5 "6-7 days"

Summary of Scoring:

Available Scores:
Global Score based on T-score conversion

Weighting:
No

Score Interpretation:
Higher score = Better capacity to perform functional activities of daily living


Content Validity

Evidence of Literature Review: Yes

Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes

Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes

Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: Yes

Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified

Recall/Observation Period:

Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: Yes

Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: Yes

Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: Yes

Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified

Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified

Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified

Evidence related to item selection: Yes

Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified


Reliability

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Yes

Evidence of internal consistency:

Test-retest Reliability (ICC):

None identified

Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):

Not applicable

Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: None identified


Validity

Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):

None identified

Known-group validity:

None identified

Evidence of Translatability Assessment: Yes

Evidence related to missing data: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: Yes

Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified

Evidence of concurrent validity: None identified

Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified

Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified


Ability to Detect Change

Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):

None identified


Responder Thresholds

Responder Thresholds:

Healthmeasures Website
- Population/Disease: Referent population (age Not stated)
- Method used: CID - Distribution
- Results: T score (50±10)
Cut-off scores: Excellent (T-Score > 60); Good (40 to 60); Fair (30 to 40) and Poor (T-Score <30)

Evidence of responder thresholds: Yes


Reference(s) of development / validation

[Conference Abstract] Singh A., Dasgupta M., Simpson P., Panepinto J. Validation of new patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) measures in children with sickle cell disease. Qual. Life Res.. 2018;27(Supplement 1):S146-S147 (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11136-018-1946-9)

Tucker CA, Bevans KB, Teneralli RE. Self-reported pediatric measures of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and strength impact for PROMIS: conceptual framework. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Winter;26(4):376-84 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4176711/)

Tucker, CA, Bevans, KB, Teneralli, RE. Self-reported pediatric measures of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and strength impact for PROMIS: item development. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 26(4), 385-92 (https://journals.lww.com/pedpt/Fulltext/2014/26040/Self_reported_Pediatric_Measures_of_Physical.3.aspx)

Information provided by the authors


Other references

None identified


Inclusion of the COA in product labelling

None identified


Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual


Original language and translations

Original Language: English for the USA

Translations:
Spanish
German


References of translations

Tucker CA , Bowles HR , Bevans KB , Teneralli RE , Smith AW, Forrest CB

Health Measures
E-mail: help@healthmeasures.net


Authors and contact information

Free Access

PROMIS measures are copyrighted. All English and Spanish version of PROMIS are publicly available for use in one’s individual research, clinical practice, educational assessment, or other application without licensing or royalty fees. Commercial users must seek permission to use, reproduce, or distribute measures. Integration into proprietary techNology requires written permission. Please read the PROMIS Terms and Conditions of Use for more information

©2008-2017 PROMIS Health Organization and PROMIS Cooperative Group.
This material can be reproduced without permission by clinicians for use with their own patients. Any other use, including electronic use, requires written permission of the PHO.


Review copy

None identified