Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Pediatric Short Form v1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment 8a

Instrument Name: Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Pediatric Short Form v1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment 8a

Abbreviation: PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - SRI 8a

Points for Consideration:

None

Description of Tool:

The PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment 8a is an 8-item PRO developed to assess sleep-related impairments in children aged 8-17 years. Respondents are asked to rate the items on a 5-level scale rangng from "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Often", to "Always". Higher scores indicate greater sleep-related impairment.

Other Related Tools (if applicable):

PROMIS Pediatric Bank v1.0 – SleepRelated Impairment
PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 – Sleep-Related Impairment 4a
PROMIS Parent Proxy Bank v1.0 – Sleep-Related Impairment
PROMIS Parent Proxy Short Form v1.0 – Sleep-Related Impairment 8a
PROMIS Parent Proxy Short Form v1.0 – Sleep-Related Impairment 4a
Differences between PROMIS measures can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/Differences_Between_PROMIS_Measures/PROMIS_Sleep_Measure_Differences_05Dec2023.pdf

Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement

Comment:

None

Year: 2018

Objective of Development:

To assess sleep-related impairment

Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):

Age range: 8-17 (Dyssomnia; Children without diagnosed sleep problem; Chronic kidney disease)

Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:

None identified

COA type: PRO

Number of Items 8

Mode of Administration: Self-administered

Data Collection Mode: Paper and pen or digital administration

Time for Completion: No information

Response Scales: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1="Never", 2="Rarely", 3="Sometimes", 4="Often", 5="Always"

Summary of Scoring:

Available scores:
The PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population.
Raw Summed Score (8-40)
T-Score (36.6-82.7)
Standard error (SE) on T-score metric (-1.34-3.27)

Weighting: No

Score Interpretation: Higher score=Greater sleep-related impairment

Evidence of Literature Review: None identified

Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes

Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes

Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: Yes

Evidence of a Saturation Grid: Yes

Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: Yes

Recall/Observation Period: Past 7-days

Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified

Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: Yes

Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified

Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified

Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: Yes

Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: Yes

Evidence related to item selection: None identified

Evidence of re-testing the final version: Yes

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified

Evidence of internal consistency: None identified

Test-retest Reliability (ICC):

None identified

Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):

None identified

Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: None identified

Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):

None identified

Known-group validity:

None identified

Evidence of Translatability Assessment: Yes

Evidence related to missing data: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified

Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified

Evidence of concurrent validity: None identified

Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified

Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified

Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):

None identified

Responder Thresholds:

None identified

Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified

Bevans, K. B., Meltzer, L. J., De La Motte, A., Kratchman, A., Viél, D., & Forrest, C. B. (2019). Qualitative Development and Content Validation of the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Health Items. Behavioral sleep medicine, 17(5), 657–671. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29693445/

Differences between PROMIS measures: https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/Differences_Between_PROMIS_Measures/PROMIS_Sleep_Measure_Differences_05Dec2023.pdf

Scoring instructions: https://www.healthmeasures.net/administrator/components/com_instruments/uploads/PROMIS%20Sleep%20Scoring%20Manual_05Dec2023.pdf

Translations: https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-to-promis/available-translations

None identified

None identified

Yes

Original language: English

Translations found on Health measures website:
German
Bulgarian
Finnish
Czech
Hungarian
Polish
Korean
Swedish
Norwegian
Slovak
Traditional Chinese
French
Portuguese
Dutch
Italian
Spanish
Translations may be requested by contacting: translations@healthmeasures.net.

None identified

Authors: Katherine B. Bevans, Lisa J. Meltzer, Anna De La Motte, Amy Kratchman, Dominique Viéld, and Christopher B. Forrest

Contact:
Katherine B. Bevans
Temple University College of Public Health,
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences,
Philadelphia,
PA,
USA
E-mail address: katherine.bevans@temple.edu

© 2008-2018 PROMIS Health Organization (PHO) This material can be reproduced without permission by clinicians for use with their own patients. Any other use, including electronic use, requires written permission of the PHO.

Measures can be obtained here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/index.php?Itemid=992)
- Paper-based measures are available in PDF form.
- PROMIS measures are available for digital administration (Computer Adaptive Tests [CATs]. short forms and profiles)
- Electronic administration of the measures for other purposes or by commercial users require HealthMeasures Electronic Administration Permission (HEAP), which includes a permission letter and screenshot review. Single research studies by non-commercial users are exempt from the HEAP requirement.

HEAP fees (charged for the review and approval process):
- Paper administration of English or Spanish measure: free
- Non-commercial electronic administration of English or Spanish measure for research: free
- Non-commercial use of existing measures: $550 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Commercial use of existing measures: $700 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Non-commercial use of custom measures: $700 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Commercial use of custom measures: $850 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Commercial use of all non-English translated measures: by quote.

More information can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/obtain-administer-measures

https://www.healthmeasures.net/

https://www.healthmeasures.net/