Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Bank v1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment

Instrument Name: Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System Bank v1.0 Sleep-Related Impairment

Abbreviation: PROMIS Bank v1.0 - SRI

Points for Consideration:

None

Description of Tool:

The Bank v1.0 - Sleep-Related Impairment is a 16-item PRO developed to assess sleep related impairment in adults. Respondents are asked to rate the items on a 5-level scale rangng from "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Often", to "Always". Higher scores indicate greater sleep-related impairment.

Other Related Tools (if applicable):

PROMIS Short Form v1.0 – SleepRelated Impairment 8a
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 – SleepRelated Impairment 4a
Differences between PROMIS measures can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/Differences_Between_PROMIS_Measures/PROMIS_Sleep_Measure_Differences_05Dec2023.pdf

Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement

Comment:

None

Year: 2010

Objective of Development:

To assess sleep-related impairment

Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):

Age range: 23-80 years (Sleep disorder; Psychiatric; Normal sleepers)

Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:

None identified

COA type: PRO

Number of Items 16

Mode of Administration: Self-administered

Data Collection Mode: Paper and pen or digital administration

Time for Completion: No information

Response Scales: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5: 1="Never", 2="Rarely", 3="Sometimes", 4="Often", 5="Always"

Summary of Scoring:

Available scores:
The PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population.

Weighting: No

Score Interpretation: Higher score=Greater sleep-related impairment

Evidence of Literature Review: Yes

Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes

Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes

Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: Yes

Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified

Recall/Observation Period: Past 7-days

Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified

Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: Yes

Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified

Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified

Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: Yes

Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: Yes

Evidence related to item selection: Yes

Evidence of re-testing the final version: Yes

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified

Evidence of internal consistency: None identified

Test-retest Reliability (ICC):

None identified

Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):

None identified

Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: None identified

Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):

Buysse DJ (2010)
- Correlation coefficient used: Product-moment correlation coefficient
- Measures: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
- Results: r=0.85
- Population/Disease: Adults (aged 23-80 years) from the community with (n=734) and without self-reported sleep disorder (n=1259), and with clinically diagnosed sleep disorder (n=259)

Known-group validity:

Buysse DJ (2010)
- Measure/Groups of patients: Self-reported insomnia (n=258), sleep apnea (n=505), restless legs syndrome (n=132) vs no sleep disorder (n=1342); Untreated vs treated clinical sleep disorder
- A priori hypotheses: Not stated
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results:
Participants with self-reported sleep disorder had significantly higher mean scores for sleep-related impairment than self-reported no sleep disorder groups (p<0.001) Participants with untreated sleep disorder had significantly higher mean scores for sleep-related impairment than those who received treatment (p<0.001) - Population/Disease: Adults (aged 23-80 years) from the community with (n=734) and without self-reported sleep disorder (n=1259), and with clinically diagnosed sleep disorder (n=259)

Evidence of Translatability Assessment: Yes

Evidence related to missing data: None identified

Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified

Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified

Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes

Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes

Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified

Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):

None identified

Responder Thresholds:

None identified

Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified

Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., Johnston, K. L., Shablesky-Cade, M. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33(6), 781–792. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20550019/

Differences between PROMIS measures: https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/Differences_Between_PROMIS_Measures/PROMIS_Sleep_Measure_Differences_05Dec2023.pdf

Scoring instructions: https://www.healthmeasures.net/administrator/components/com_instruments/uploads/PROMIS%20Sleep%20Scoring%20Manual_05Dec2023.pdf

Translations: https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-to-promis/available-translations

None identified

None identified

Yes

Original language: English

Translations found on Health measures website:
Spanish
Dutch
Dutch-Flemish
French
Hebrew
Traditional Chinese
Portuguese
Simplified Chinese (Mandarin)
Arabic
Translations may be requested by contacting: translations@healthmeasures.net.

Dutch-Flemish
Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., de Vet, H. C., Dekker, J., Westhovens, R., van Leeuwen, J., Cella, D., Correia, H., Arnold, B., Perez, B., & Boers, M. (2014). Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 23(6), 1733–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6

Authors: Daniel J. Buysse, MD, Lan Yu, PhD, Douglas E. Moul, MD, MPH, Anne Germain, PhD, Angela Stover, MA, Nathan E. Dodds, BS, Kelly L. Johnston, MPH, Melissa A. Shablesky-Cade, Paul A. Pilkonis, PhD

Contact:
Dr. Buysse,
3811 O’Hara ST, Pittsburgh,
PA 15213; Tel: (412) 246-6413; Fax: (412) 246-5300;
E-mail address: buyssedj@upmc.edu

© 2008-2022 PROMIS Health Organization and PROMIS Cooperative Group This material can be reproduced without permission by clinicians for use with their own patients. Any other use, including electronic use, requires written permission of the PHO.

Measures can be obtained here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/index.php?Itemid=992)
- Paper-based measures are available in PDF form.
- PROMIS measures are available for digital administration (Computer Adaptive Tests [CATs]. short forms and profiles)
- Electronic administration of the measures for other purposes or by commercial users require HealthMeasures Electronic Administration Permission (HEAP), which includes a permission letter and screenshot review. Single research studies by non-commercial users are exempt from the HEAP requirement.

HEAP fees (charged for the review and approval process):
- Paper administration of English or Spanish measure: free
- Non-commercial electronic administration of English or Spanish measure for research: free
- Non-commercial use of existing measures: $550 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Commercial use of existing measures: $700 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Non-commercial use of custom measures: $700 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Commercial use of custom measures: $850 per measure for study duration or 3-year term.
- Commercial use of all non-English translated measures: by quote.

More information can be found here: https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/obtain-administer-measures

https://www.healthmeasures.net/

https://www.healthmeasures.net/