COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Obstructive Sleep Apnea-20
Abbreviation: OSA-20
Points for Consideration:
None
Description of Tool:
The Obstructive Sleep Apnea-20 (OSA-20) is a 20-item ObsRO developed to determine the impact of OSA on children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Parents are asked to describe how often during the previous 4 weeks their child had exhibited specific symptoms. Items are rated on a 7-level scale ranging from 1="None of the time", 2="Hardly any of the time", 3="A little of the time", 4="Some of the time", 5="A good bit of the time", 6="Most of the time", to 7="All of the time". A higher score indicates a poorer disease-specific quality of life.
Other Related Tools (if applicable):
The OSA-18 consists of 18 items to determine the impact of OSA on children's health-related quality of life. This revised version does not include Item 12 (Social problems) and Item 16 (School problems) included in the OSA-20.
The OSA-5 consists of 5 items to help screen and triage children at risk of obstructive sleep apnea among large numbers of referrals for sleep-disordered breathing. This revised version consists of Item 1 (Loud snoring), Item 2 (Breath holding spells or pauses in breathing at night), Item 3 (Choking or gasping sounds while asleep), Item 5 (Mouth breathing because of nasal obstruction) and Item 16 (Breathing problems during sleep that made you worried that they were not getting enough air) included in the OSA-18.
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement
Comment:
The OSA-20 originally consisted of 20 items assessing the impact of OSA on children's health-related quality of life. During the original psychometric validitation performed by Franco et al., 2000, Item 12 (Social problems) and Item 16 (School problems) were removed due to low relevance and trivial correlation with the 3 validity measures used in the study (i.e., respiratory distress index, tonsil size, adenoid size), resulting in the final COA being renamed OSA-18 and consisting of 18 items.
Year: 1999
Objective of Development:
To determine the impact of OSA on children's health-related quality of life
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
Age range: 6 months-12 years old (Sleep-disordered breathing)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
None identified
COA type: ObsRO
Number of Items 20
Mode of Administration: Caregiver-rated
Data Collection Mode: Paper and pen administration
Time for Completion: No information
Response Scales: 7-point scale ranging from 1="None of the time", 2="Hardly any of the time", 3="A little of the time", 4="Some of the time", 5="A good bit of the time", 6="Most of the time", to 7="All of the time"
Summary of Scoring:
Available scores: An overall summary score and additional scores for individual domains can be obtained. The OSA-20 survey score is obtained by summing the scores of all 20 items, ranging from 20 to 140. The summary score
is the average of all 20 items. Domain scores reflect the average of the 4 items within that domain. Summary and domain scores can range from 1.0 to 7.0.
Weighting: No
Score interpretation: Higher scores=Poorer disease-specific quality of life.
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: None identified
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: Yes
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period: Past 4 weeks
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: Yes
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: None identified
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Yes
Evidence of internal consistency: Franco RA (1999) - Method: Item-total correlation - Results: 0.38-0.86 - Population/Disease: Children aged 6 months-12 years; n=61
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Franco RA (1999)
Test-retest reliability
- Spearman rank correlation: Excellent test-retest reliability was obtained for the individual survey items (R > 0.74).
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: Not stated
- Time frame between the two administrations: 3 days
- Population/disease: Children aged 6 months-12 years; n=61
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
None identified
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Franco RA (1999)
Convergent validity
- Correlation coefficient used: Spearman rank correlation coefficient
- Measures: Respiratory distress index (RDI), tonsil size and adenoid size
- Results: Construct validity was suggested by fair-to-good correlation between the sleep disturbance and caregiver concern domain items and the RDI, which were all statistically significant except for item 4, fragmented sleep. This item, however, did show significant correlation with adenoid size. Mouth breathing (item 5) showed an expected correlation with adenoid size, and dysphagia (item 8) had weak correlation with tonsil and adenoid size. Items 6 and 7 had weak correlation with objective measures. The poorest correlations with objective external measures were observed for items in the emotional distress and daytime function domains. Items 12 and 16 were eliminated from the survey because they showed low problem rates (about 70% of caregivers reported no problem for each) and trivial correlation with all 3 validity measures (RDI, tonsil size,adenoid size).
- Population/Disease: Children aged 6 months-12 years; n=61
Known-group validity:
None identified
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Responder Thresholds:
None identified
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Franco RA Jr, Rosenfeld RM, Rao M. First place--resident clinical science award 1999. Quality of life for children with obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jul;123(1 Pt 1):9-16. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105254. PMID: 10889473. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10889473/
Other references
Soh HJ, Rowe K, Davey MJ, Horne RSC, Nixon GM. The OSA-5: Development and validation of a brief questionnaire screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;113:62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.07.029. Epub 2018 Jul 19. PMID: 30174012. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30174012/
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Yes
Original language and translations
None identified
References of translations
None identified
Condition of use: copyright
None identified
Website
None identified
Review copy
https://aao-hnsfjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1067/mhn.2000.105254