COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function - NIH Toolbox Standing Balance Test Ages 3-6 v2.0
Abbreviation: NIH Toolbox Standing Balance Test Ages 3-6 v2.0
Points for Consideration:
Little data available
Description of Tool:
The NIH Toolbox Standing Balance Test Ages 3-6, v2.0 is a PerfO assessing a child in 5 standing positions. Each test is rated as pass/fail, with lower scores representing better performance.
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: MA or BA
Comment:
The NIH Toolbox Standing Balance Test Ages 3-6 v2.0 is a specific test within the NIH Toolbox Balance
The NIH Toolbox Balance is a subdomain within the NIH Toolbox Motor Battery
Year: 2013
Objective of Development:
To measure motor function across the age span from 3-6 years old, with a focus on balance
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
3-6 years (All)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Wounds and Injuries
COA type:
Number of Items 5
Mode of Administration:
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: 7 minutes
Response Scales: Dichotomous: Pass or Fail
Summary of Scoring:
Available Scores:
Global Score
Scores by domains
Scores by items
Cutoff score: <2 SDs below the mean (score <30) is suggestive of motor dysfunction
Weighting: No
Score Interpretation: Lower score = Better performance
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: Yes
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: Not applicable
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period:
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: Not applicable
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: Not applicable
Evidence related to item selection: Not applicable
Evidence of re-testing the final version: Yes
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Not applicable
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Rine RM (2013)
Information Not specified for the share of the population aged 3-6 years in the child population
- Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): ranged from 0.82 to 0.97
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame or interval between the two administrations: 25 minutes
- Population/Disease: Patients of 3 to 17 years; n= about107
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Not applicable
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Rine RM (2013)
- Correlation coefficient used: Spearman Nonparametric correlation coefficient
- Measure: Sensory Organization Testing (SOT) condition 5
- Results:
Information Not specified for the share of the population aged 3 to 6 years in the child population
Significant correlations were found between the SOT condition 5 and the BAM 4: r= -0.48; p= 0.04
- Population/Disease: Healthy and children with vestibular disorder ; n= about 107
Known-group validity:
Rine RM (2013)
- Measure/Groups of patients: Center of Pressure (COP)
- A priori hypotheses: COP would correlate with NPL scores
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Yes
- Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient:
Information Not specified for the share of the population aged 3 to 6 years in the child population
Correlations were found between NPL scores and COP: r= 0.42 to 0.85, p Not stated
- Population/Disease: Healthy and children with vestibular disorder ; n= about 107
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Reuben DB, Magasi S, McCreath HE, BohanNon RW, Wang YC, Bubela DJ, Rymer WZ, Beaumont J, Rine RM, Lai JS, Gershon RC. Motor assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S65-75
(Full Text Article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662336/pdf/WNL204799.pdf)
Rine RM, Schubert MC, Whitney SL, Roberts D, Redfern MS, MusoliNo MC, Roche JL, Steed DP, Corbin B, Lin CC, Marchetti GF, Beaumont J, Carey JP, Shepard NP, Jacobson GP, Wrisley DM, Hoffman HJ, Furman G, Slotkin J. Vestibular function assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S25-31
(Full Text Article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662339/
Other references
HealthMeasures website: https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/nih-toolbox
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Original language and translations
Original: English for the USA
Translations:
Spanish
References of translations
None identified
Condition of use: copyright
*Free access
*Use of the NIH Toolbox measures/instruments, related materials, and services require acceptance of all terms and conditions stated herein. (https://nihtoolbox.my.salesforce.com/sfc/p/#2E000001H4ee/a/2E000000Me93/QjZknkZDFaOHxigvKJ5Gtr0d7FNX21qc.vVqVrXrMBI) You agree to abide by all of NTAC as a condition of reviewing or using the NIH Toolbox. No modifications or additions to these terms and conditions are binding upon NU/NIH unless previously agreed to in writing by an authorized representative of NU or the NIH. NU/ NIH reserves the right to update the NTAC at any time. Changes in the NTAC shall apply to new users, new measures and to new projects created by existing users after such changes are posted.
Website
Health Measures website (http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/nih-toolbox/obtain-and-administer-measures)
Review copy
Review copy available here (http://www.healthmeasures.net/index.php?Itemid=992)