COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Modified Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment-Gait
Abbreviation: MPOMA-G
Points for Consideration:
Has been used in more recent FDA approvals
Description of Tool:
The Modified Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment-Gait (MPOMA-G) is a ClinRO developed to detect clinically significant impairments in gait in videos of children aged 5-15 years with hypophosphatasia. It is composed of 8 items assessing gait.
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: MA or BA
Comment:
The m-POMA-G was based on the POMA gait observations. These were initially developed from the Fall Risk Index.
Year: 2018
Objective of Development:
To detect clinically significant impairments in gait in videos of children with hypophosphatasia
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
5-15 years (Hypophosphatasia)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Nervous System Diseases; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
COA type:
Number of Items 8
Mode of Administration:
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: Not reported
Response Scales: Categorical rating scale. Depending on the item either 2 or 3 behavioral definitions.
Summary of Scoring:
Available scores: Global score ranging from 0 to 12
Weighting: No
Score Interpretation: Higher score = Better gait performance
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period:
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: Yes
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: None identiifed
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Not applicable
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Phillips (2018)
Intra-rater reliability
- Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): 0.76 (p< 0.001)
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame or interval between the two administrations: 8 months
- Population/Disease: Children and adolescents 5-15 years old with hypophosphatasia; n= 14
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Phillips (2018)
- Correlation coefficient used: Pearson's correlation coefficient
- Measure: Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Sports/Physical Functioning and Transfer/Basic Mobility domains; Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI)
- Results:
- There were significant correlations between mPOMA-G scores and PODCI Sports/Physical Functioning domain scores in both, infantile HPP (r= 0.78) and childhood HPP (r= 0.65); p< 0.0001 for all results
- There were significant correlations between mPOMA-G scores and PODCI Transfer/Basic Mobility domain scores in both, infantile HPP (r= 0.72; p= 0.00002) and childhood HPP (r= 0.57; p= 0.0001)
- There were significant correlations between mPOMA-G scores and CHAQ-DI scores in both, infantile HPP (r= 0.86) and childhood HPP (r= 0.72); p< 0.0001 for all results
- Population/Disease: Children with hypophosphatasia (age range 5-15 years); Infantile HPP: n= 5 (21 observations); Childhood HPP: n= 8 (39 observations)
Known-group validity:
Phillips (2018)
- Measure/Groups of patients: Distance walked as measured by the 6-Minute Walk Test
- A priori hypotheses: Not stated
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: Pearson correlation coefficient. There were significant correlations between mPOMA-G scores and distance walked in both, infantile HPP (r= 0.83) and childhood HPP (r= 0.70); p< 0.0001 for all results
- Population/Disease: Children with hypophosphatasia (age range 5-15 years); Infantile HPP: n= 5 (28 observations); Childhood HPP: n= 8 (51 observations)
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: Yes
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Phillips D, Griffin D, Przybylski T, Morrison E, Reeves AL, Vallee M, Fujita KP, Madson KL. Development and validation of a modified performance-oriented mobility assessment tool for assessing mobility in children with hypophosphatasia. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2018;11(3):187-192 (Full text article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294582/pdf/prm-11-prm170523.pdf)
Other references
Grieco JC, Romero B, Flood E, Cabo R, Visootsak J. A Conceptual Model of Angelman Syndrome and Review of Relevant Clinical Outcomes Assessments (COAs). Patient. 2019 Feb;12(1):97-112
Full text article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/29987743/
See PubMed results: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22mPOMA-G%22&sort=date)
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
Yes
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
Strensiq, Asfotase Alfa (FDA, 2015)
Results:
Juvenile-Onset HPP
Skeletal Manifestations: All 8 treated patients were rated as responders by Month 54 of treatment. The mean duration between the baseline and last RGI-C assessments for control patients was 56 months (range was 8 to 95 months). At last assessment, 2/32 (6%) of control patients were rated as responders.
Eight of 20 (40%) patients with juvenile-onset HPP experienced new fractures during the course of treatment. There were insufficient data to assess the effect of STRENSIQ on fractures.
Gait/Mobility: Step length improved by at least 1 point in either foot in 6/8 patients compared to 1/6 (17%) control patients. The proportion of patients who had 6MWT percent predicted values within the Normal range for age, sex, and height-matched peers increased from 0/8 patients at baseline to 6/6 patients (100%) by Month 48 and all 6 were also able to walk longer distances at this time point compared to baseline.
Long-Term Extension Trials in Juvenile-Onset HPP
At last assessment, 7 patients with available 6MWT results had maintained improvements in gait/mobility
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Original language and translations
Original: English for the USA
Translations:
None identified
References of translations
N/A
Condition of use: copyright
Copyright: According to the author, Dawn Philipps, I believe the copyright would belong to Alexion with a patent that only limits application to Hypophosphatasia.
CoU:
*Free access according to Dawn Philipps
* for further information, please contact directly Dr. Dawn Phillips
Website
Not reported
Review copy
Available in Table 1 in Phillips D, 2018