COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Facial Action Summary Score
Abbreviation: FASS
Points for Consideration:
None
Description of Tool:
The Facial Action Summary Score (FASS) is a 5-item ClinRO, developed from facial video sequences of children in the peri-operative period using 5-items representing different face movements of child pain. A facial drawing illustrates the facial expressions of pain for five action units. Clinicians code 1 (with a cross) for the presence or 0 (no cross) for the absence of each item. Higher scores represent greater pain.
Other Related Tools (if applicable):
None identified
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: PhD or MA
Comment:
None
Year: 2009
Objective of Development:
The primary objective was to determine a criterion index to study the validity of behavior rating scales
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
Age range: <7 years (Pain)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Children <7 years from a post-anesthesia care unit
COA type: ClinRO
Number of Items 5 items
Mode of Administration: Clinician-rated
Data Collection Mode: Pen and paper administration
Time for Completion: None identified
Response Scales: Pictorial scale with facial expressions of pain for the five action units (brow lower, eye squeeze, deepened naso-labial furrows, upper lip raiser, lower lip depressor) scored with 1=presence or 0=absence
Summary of Scoring:
Available scores: Total score ranging from 0 to 5
Weighting: No
Score Interpretation: Higher score=Greater pain
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period: Present time
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: Yes
Evidence of re-testing the final version: Yes
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Yes
Evidence of internal consistency: Bringuier S (2021) - Method: Cronbach's alpha. - Results: 0.89 - Population/Disease: Children <7years of age in post-anesthesia care; n=123
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
None identified
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Bringuier S (2009)
Interrater reliability
- Correlation Coefficient used: Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and kappa coefficient. Reliability for the total score was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.93-0.95). Reliability ranged from 0.86 to 0.94 for the five items (kappa coefficient 0.86 to 0.94); p not stated
- Population/Disease: n=123 children <7years of age in post-anesthesia care
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Convergent validity
Correlation coefficient used: Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients (r)
Measures: FASS; Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R); Face, legs, activity, cry, consoling (FLACC)
Results:
FPS-R: (r=0.8; p<0.0001)
FLACC: (r=0.9; p<0.0001)
Population/Disease: n=123 children <7years of age in post-anesthesia care (Bringuier et al., 2021).
Divergent validity
Correlation coefficient used: Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients (r)
Measures: Facial Action Summary Score (FASS); Visual Analog Scale-Anxiety
Results: r=0.6; p<0.0001
Population/Disease: n=123 children <7years of age in post-anesthesia care (Bringuier et al., 2021).
Known-group validity:
None identified
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: Yes
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
Bringuier S (2021)
- Method: FASS was assessed before and after rescue analgesia
- Results: There was a significant decrease of scores after rescue analgesia (β-2.75 [−2.96–2.54] p < .0001)
- Population/Disease: Children <7years of age in post-anesthesia care; n=123
Responder Thresholds
Responder Thresholds:
None identified
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Bringuier, S., Picot, M. C., Dadure, C., Rochette, A., Raux, O., Boulhais, M., & Capdevila, X. (2009). A prospective comparison of post-surgical behavioral pain scales in preschoolers highlighting the risk of false evaluations. Pain, 145(1-2), 60–68. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19577364/
Bringuier, S., Macioce, V., Boulhais, M., Dadure, C., & Capdevila, X. (2021). Facial expressions of pain in daily clinical practice to assess postoperative pain in children: Reliability and validity of the facial action summary score. European journal of pain (London, England), 25(5), 1081–1090. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33428820/
Other references
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Yes
Original language and translations
None identified
References of translations
None identified
Condition of use: copyright
None identified
Website
None identified
Review copy
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1729