COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Summary of normative data available
- Summary of normative data
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: EVENDOL Pain Scale
Abbreviation: None
Points for Consideration:
Instructions state: 'Note everything you observe, even if you think the symptoms are not due to pain but to fear, tiredness or illness severity'.
Description of Tool:
The EVENDOL pain scale is a 5-item ClinRO developed to measure pain in young children (up to 7 years old) presenting in the accident and emergency department. Clinicians are asked to observe the child and rate their behaviour on a 4-level scale "sign absent", "sign weak or transient", "sign moderate or present about half the time", "sign strong or present almost all the time". Higher scores represent more pain.
Other Related Tools (if applicable):
None identified
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: PhD or MA
Comment:
None
Year: 2012
Objective of Development:
To assess pain in young children in emergency departments
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
Age range: 0-7 years (Pain)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Children presenting in the pediatric emergency department
COA type: ClinRo
Subscales: Not applicable
Number of Items 5
Mode of Administration: Clinician-rated
Data Collection Mode: Paper and pen administration
Time for Completion: No information
Response Scales: 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0=
Summary of Scoring:
Available scores: Global score ranging from 0 to 15
Weighting: No
Score Interpretation: Higher score = More pain
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period: Present time
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: Yes
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: Yes
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: Yes
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Yes
Evidence of internal consistency: Fournier-Charrière E (2012) Method: Cronbach's alpha Results: 0.70-0.95 Population/Disease: Children aged birth to 83 months; n=291
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
None identified
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Fournier-Charrière E (2012)Interrater reliability- Correlation Coefficient used: Pearsons r and weighted kappa coefficient. Reliability ranged from 0.89-0.98 (p<0.001); k=0.70-0.90 in nurse scores at same time, 0.80 between nurse and researcher scores at 4 timepoints- Population/Disease: n=291 children aged birth to 83 months
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Fournier-Charrière E (2012)
Convergent validity
- Correlation coefficient used: Pearson's r
- Measures: EVENDOL pain scale; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R); Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontaria Pain Scale (CHEOPS); Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC), Toddler Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale (TPPPS); Echelle Douluer et inconfort du nouveau-né (EDIN); time points: T1=arrival at emergency department; T2 after antalgic administration; R=rest; M=mobilization.
- Results:
EVENDOL and NRS: 0.79-0.92 depending on time point (p<0.001)
EVENDOL and FPS-R self report: 0.65 (p<0.001)
EVENDOL and EDIN (newborns); FLACC (2 months- 6 years); TPPPS (6 months-6 years); CHEOPs (1 year-6 years): 0.70-0.91 depending on time point at T1-R and T1-M.
- Population/Disease: n=291 children aged birth to 83 months
Fournier-Charrière E (2012)
Divergent validity
- Correlation coefficient used: Pearson's r
- Measures: EVENDOL pain scale vs child's fever, anxiety, fatigue and hunger.
- Results:
No significant correlations were observed (0.12-0.34).
- Population/Disease: n=291 children aged birth to 83 months
Known-group validity:
Fournier-Charrière E (2012)
- Measure/Groups of patients: A priori pain (children with bone fractures n=38) during movement vs rest; a priori pain (illness/injury with varied degrees of pain n=257) vs a priori without pain (non-painful illness n=34).
- A priori hypotheses: Not stated
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results:
Children with bone fractures had high EVENDOL scores during movement (median score=12) than at rest (mean difference=4.7 points; p<0.001)
Children with illnesses a priori considered non-painful were allocated lower (not significant p=0.006) EVENDOL scores (mean score=2.6) than children with pain (mean score=4.0)
- Population/Disease: n=291 children aged birth to 83 months
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: Yes
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: Yes
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: Yes
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
Fournier-Charrière E (2012)
- Method: Change in EVENDOL score before and after analgesic treatment was studied.
- Results:
The median EVENDOL scores before and after administration of nalbuphine or morphine (n=30) decreased from 9 to 3 at rest and from 13 to 6 during mobilization of the painful area.
The median EVENDOL scores before and after administration of codeine (n=18_ decreased from 7 to 0 at rest and from 11 to 4 during movement.
The median EVENDOL scores before and after administration of acetaminophen alone (n=63) decreased from 3 to 9 at rest and from 7 to 3 during movement.
- Population/Disease: n=291 children aged birth to 83 months
Responder Thresholds
Responder Thresholds:
None identified
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Fournier-Charrière, E., Tourniaire, B., Carbajal, R., Cimerman, P., Lassauge, F., Ricard, C., Reiter, F., Turquin, P., Lombart, B., Letierce, A., & Falissard, B. (2012). EVENDOL, a new behavioral pain scale for children ages 0 to 7 years in the emergency department: design and validation. Pain, 153(8), 1573–1582. Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22609430/
Other references
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling (agency, drug, drug approval date, COA results) from PROLABELS search
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Yes
Summary of normative data available
None identified
Summary of normative data
None identified
Original language and translations
Original language: French
Translations: English
References of translations
Fournier-Charrière, E., Tourniaire, B., Carbajal, R., Cimerman, P., Lassauge, F., Ricard, C., Reiter, F., Turquin, P., Lombart, B., Letierce, A., & Falissard, B. (2012). EVENDOL, a new behavioral pain scale for children ages 0 to 7 years in the emergency department: design and validation. Pain, 153(8), 1573–1582.
Condition of use: copyright
© 2011 - Evendol Group.
The authors allow open access to and free use of the EVENDOL instrument but retain copyright; if it is used, the mention '© 2011 EVENDOL group' is required; the scale can be downloaded from the website https://pediadol.org/, a french site on pediatric pain.
Review copy
https://pediadol.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/EVENDOL_gb.pdf