COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Activities Scale for Kids-Performance
Abbreviation: ASK-Performance
Points for Consideration:
Sound psychometrics; easy to administer; unclear responsiveness. Population dependent.
Description of Tool:
The Activities Scale for Kids-ASK is a PRO used to assess physical function in children. The tool has both a self-report measure (capability) as well as a performance measure. The ASK-performance is most commonly used in research studies and covers children ages 5 to 15 years.
The ASK(C) performance asks what the child 'did do' during the previous week.
The tool contains 30 items that can be used to derive a total score, as well as 7 subdomain scores: personal care, dressing, other skills, locomotion, play, standing skills, and transfers.
Children under 9 often need an adult to read the questions to them.
Other Related Tools (if applicable):
ASK-Capability
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement
Year: 1996
Objective of Development:
To measure physical disability in children with musculoskeletal disorders
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
5-15 years (Musculoskeletal Pain, Cerebral Palsy, Scoliosis, Cystic Fibrosis)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
ASK: Immune system diseases; Musculoskeletal diseases; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Wounds and injuries; Nervous system diseases; Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases; Neoplasms; Cardiovascular diseases; Respiratory tract diseases; Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
COA type: PRO
Number of Items 30
Mode of Administration: Self-administered
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: 5 to 12 minutes
Response Scales: 5-point verbal rating scale: 0
Summary of Scoring:
Available Scores:
Global score ranging from 0 to 100
Weighting:
No
Score Interpretation:
Higher score = Better performance
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: Yes
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: Yes
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: Yes
Recall/Observation Period: The last week
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: Yes
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: Yes
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: Yes
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: Yes
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: Yes
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Yes
Evidence of internal consistency:
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Young NL (2009)
Paper-version:
- Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): 0.987
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame or interval between the two administrations: Mean time: 23 days
- Population/Disease: Children with cerebral palsy, spina bifida, and cystic fibrosis; n=21, age range included in this range: 8.04-13.37 years)
Web-version:
- Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC):
ASK-P: 0.989
ASK-P subdomains:
Personal care: 0.964
Dressing: 0.984
Other skills: 0.720
Play: 0.661
Locomotion: 0.967
Standing skills: 0.834
Transfers: 0.975
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame or interval between the two administrations: Mean time: 23 days
- Population/Disease: Children with cerebral palsy, spina bifida, and cystic fibrosis; n=18, age range included in this range: 8.04-13.37 years)
Lawitschka A (2020)
German ASKp
- Pearson correlation coefficient:
- Between T0 and T3, r= 0.659 (p<0.001); T0 and T6, r= 0.676 (p<0.001); T0 and T9, r= 0.453 (p<0.05); T0 and T12, r= 0.523 (p<0.05), T0 and T15, r= 0.494 (p<0.05), T0 and T18, r= 0.644 (p<0.01)
- Between T3 and T6, r= 0.935 (p<0.001); T3 and T9, r= 0.832 (p<0.001), T3 and T12, r= 0.934 (p<0.001), T3 and T15, r= 0.909 (p<0.001), T2 and T18, r= 0.900 (p<0.001)
- Between T6 and T9, r= 0.621 (p<0.01), T6 and T12, r= 0.832 (p<0.001), T6 and T18, r= 0.909 (p<0.001)
- Between T9 and T12, r= 0.806 (p<0.001), T9 and T19, r= 0.565 (p<0.05)
- Between T12 and T15, r= 0.739 (p<0.001), T13 and T18, r= 0.867 (p<0.001)
- Between T15 and T18, r= 0.964 (p<0.001)
- Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
- Time frame or interval between the two administrations: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 yeas), median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Not reported
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Pencharz (2001)
1- Correlation coefficient used: Pearson's correlation coefficient
- Measure: Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form physical function subscale (CHQ-PF-28) and Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument global function (PODCI)
- Results: Significant correlations were found between ASK-P, CHQ-PF-28 and PODCI: p Not stated
CHQ-PF-28 physical function subscale: 0.5
PODCI global function: 0.8
- Population/Disease: Children with fractures, spinal disorder, neuromuscular conditions, other musculoskeletal conditions; n=166, average age: 10.9± 2.6 years
Wright JG (2008)
2- Correlation coefficient used: Pearson's correlation coefficient
- Measure: Muscular Dystrophy Spine Questionnaire (MDSQ) and Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Questionnaire (PODCQ)
- Results: Significant correlations were found between ASK-P, MDSQ and PODCQ:
MDSQ: 0.40, p<0.05
PODCQ: -0.66, p<0.001
- Population/Disease: Patients with muscular distrophy and scoliosis; n=26, age mean 15.2±2.90 years
Smith PL (2005)
3- Correlation coefficient used: Pearson's correlation coefficient
- Measure: Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Questionnaire (PODCQ), Spina Bifida Hips Questionnaire (SBHQ)
- Results: Significant correlations were found between ASK-P, SBHQ, and PODCQ: p<0.01 for all results
SBHQ: 0.79
PODCQ: 0.81
- Population/Disease: Patients with spina bifida and dislocated hips; n=34 age mean 11.6 +/- 3.9 years
Known-group validity:
Pencharz (2001)
1- Measure/Groups of patients: Clinicians' global ratings
- A priori hypotheses: ASK-P scores would correlate with clinicians' and ratings
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Yes
- Results: Significant correlation was found between ASK-P score and clinicians' ratings: r=0.5, p Not stated
- Population/Disease: Children with fractures and spinal disorder; n ranged from 95 to 166, average age: 10.9± 2.6 years
2- Measure/Groups of patients: Clinicians' global ratings and ambulation level
- A priori hypotheses: ASK-P scores would discriminate patients' within each clinical criteria
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Yes
- Results: Significantly different ASK-P scores were found within each clinical criteria: F-test statistic, p<0.0001
Clinicians' global ratings: 25.2
Ambulation level: 70.6
- Population/Disease: Children with fractures and spinal disorder; n ranged from 95 to 166, average age: 10.9± 2.6 years
Young NL (2000)
KNown-groups validity:
3- Measure/Groups of patients: Disability levels measured by clinician's global ratings: mild (n=10), moderate (n=11), and severe (n=3)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: Significant differences were found between ASK-P scores for children of different disability levels: ANOVA, data Not shown, p<0.0001
- Population/Disease: Children with musculoskeletal disorder; n see above, mean age: 10.2± 3.33 years
Plint (2003)
4- Measure/Groups of patients: Disability levels: No disability (n=122), mild (n=10), moderate (n=11) and severe disability (n=3)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: Significant differences were found between "No disability "ASK-P score and the other groups: Mean (SD), p<0.005 for all results
No disability: 93.12 (6.45)
Mild disability: 85.86 (13.77)
Moderate disability: 52.66 (22.53)
Severe disability: 21.00 (10.23)
- Population/Disease: Children with or without musculoskeletal disorder; n see above, ahe range for children without musculosketal disorder 10.45 years (±2.99)
Lawitschka A (2020)
German ASKp
5- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according their need of devices in two groups: Yes (n= 10) or No (n= 45)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients who need devices had significantly (p<0.001) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.32(0.87) than patients who didn't need (Mean(SD)= 3.31(0.52), F= 22.298
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
6- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the presence of endocrine comorbidity in two groups: Yes (n= 13) or No (n= 42)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients who had endocrine comorbidity showed significantly (p<0.05) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.77(1.02) than patients who had Not (Mean(SD)= 3.24(0.54), F= 4.747
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
7- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the presence of endocrine comorbidity in two groups: Yes (n= 13) or No (n= 42)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients who had endocrine comorbidity showed significantly (p<0.05) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.77(1.02) than patients who had Not (Mean(SD)= 3.24(0.54), F= 4.747
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
8- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the severity chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) of in two groups: No-cGVHD (n= 36) and Moderate/Severe cGVHD (n= 19)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients with No-cGVHD showed significantly (p<0.05) higher ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 3.26(0.53) than patients with moderate/severe cGVHD (Mean(SD)= 2.88(0.88), F= 4050
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
9- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the presence of overlap (acute and chronic) cGVHD of in two groups: Yes (n= 9) and No (n= 46)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients with overlap cGVHD showed significantly (p<0.05) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.54(0.074) than patients without (Mean(SD)= 3.23(0.64), F= 8.198
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
10- Measure/Groups of patients: Correlation with cGVHD severity 10 point scale made by a clinician vs No-cGVHD
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: Pearson correlation coefficient
Significant (p<0.01) correlation was found: r= -0.384
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
11- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the joint involvement in two groups: Yes (n= 9) and No (n= 46)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results:ANOVA
Patients with joint involvement showed significantly (p<0.05) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.81(0.59) than patients without (Mean(SD)= 3.23(0.69), F= 6.130
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
12- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the presence of steroid side effects in two groups: Yes (n= 9) and No (n= 46)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients with joint involvement showed significantly (p<0.001) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.28(1.14) than patients without (Mean(SD)= 3.28(0.53), F= 17.229
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
13- Measure/Groups of patients: Patients classified according the presence of cGVHD-associated symptoms in two groups: Yes (n= 10) and No (n= 45)
- A priori hypotheses: Not detailed
- Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
- Results: ANOVA
Patients withcGVHD-associated symptoms showed significantly (p<0.01) lower ASKp scores (Mean(SD)= 2.67(0.91) than patients without (Mean(SD)= 3.30(0.53), F= 10.044
- Population/Disease: Patients with or without chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; n= 55, median age 12 (range 4-23 years)
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: Yes
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Young NL, Yoshida KK, Williams JI. The role of children in reporting their physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Oct;76(10):913-8.
(PubMed Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7487430/)
Young NL, Williams JI, Yoshida KK. The context of measuring disability: does it matter whether capability or performance is measured? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;49(10):1097-101.
(PubMed Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8826988/)
Young NL, Williams JI, Yoshida KK, Wright JG. Measurement properties of the activities scale for kids. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):125-37.
(Full Text Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10729684/)
Wai EK, Owen J, Fehlings D. Assessing physical disability in children with spina bifida and scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6):765-70.
(PubMed Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11097251/)
Plint AC, Gaboury I, Owen J, Young NL. Activities scale for kids: an analysis of Normals. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):788-90. PMID: 14581784.
(PubMed Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14581784/)
Young NL, Varni JW, Snider L. The Internet is valid and reliable for child-report: an example using the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):314-20.
(PubMed Abstract https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18834710/)
Smith PL, Owen JL, Fehlings D, Wright JG. Measuring physical function in children with spina bifida and dislocated hips: the Spina Bifida Hips Questionnaire. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 (Pubmed abstract)
Other references
Pencharz J, Young NL, Owen JL, Wright JG. Comparison of three outcomes instruments in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Jul-Aug;21(4):425-32.
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11433150/)
Lawitschka A, Brunmair M, Bauer D. Psychometric properties of the Activities Scale for Kids-performance after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adolescents and children : Results of a prospective study on behalf of the German-Austrian-Swiss GVHD Consortium. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021 Jan;133(1-2):41-51.
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32246210/)
Wright JG, Smith PL, Owen JL, Fehlings D. Assessing functional outcomes of children with muscular dystrophy and scoliosis: the Muscular Dystrophy Spine Questionnaire. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Dec;28(8):840-5.
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19034175/)
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Yes
Original language and translations
Original language:
English for Canada
Translations:
Portuguese for Portugal
Italian for Italy
Chinese for China
References of translations
Italian for Italy:
Fabbri L, Neviani R, Festini F, Costi S. Transcultural validation of Activities Scale for Kids (ASK): translation and pilot test. Acta Biomed. 2016 May 26;87 Suppl 2:70-9. PMID: 27240035 (PubMed abstract)
Costi S, Bressi B, Cavuto S, Braglia L, Ferrari A, Pelosin E. Cross-cultural validation of Activities Scale for Kids: the performance of healthy Italian children. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2020 Jul;60(7):1014-1019 (PubMed abstract)
Costi S, Mecugni D, Beccani L, Alboresi S, Bressi B, Paltrinieri S, Ferrari A, Pelosin E. Construct Validity of the Activities Scale for Kids Performance in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Brief Report. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020 Oct;23(7):474-477 (Full text article)
Portuguese for Portugal:
Paixão D, Cavalheiro LM, Gonçalves RS, Ferreira PL. Portuguese cultural adaptation and validation of the Activities Scale for Kids (ASK). J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016 Jul-Aug;92(4):367-73 (PubMed abstract)
Condition of use: copyright
*Access with author’s written permission, for students and professors request a copy of the ASK© by following these steps
*With fees for commercial/pharmaceutical companies: for Commercial & Industry Sponsored Researchers, please contact us directly and we’ll customize an ASK© licensing arrangement that will fit your needs. For Clinicians and Researchers, get started using the ASK© by following these steps (http://www.activitiesscaleforkids.com/?page_id=287)
*With the signature of a contract/agreement, please see the different conditions of use on the ASK© website (http://www.activitiesscaleforkids.com/)
Website
ASK© website (http://www.activitiesscaleforkids.com/)
ASK© publications webpage (http://www.activitiesscaleforkids.com/?page_id=210)
Review copy
List of items available in Young et al. 2000 (https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/48847124/s0895-4356_2899_2900113-420160914-6255-1k2yqa8.pdf?1473915123=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DMeasurement_properties_of_the_Activities.pdf&Expires=1613984775&Signature=Aphk1pHkbLzdWKjp7a00UQBSPG~zRP~mx~NXBG6GuBa9kx-cipQ9yQOEm4-Xolid70EuyxOr1tDWBH1EMaQIguony19oWfINlDFEQ-9AmlUDKshYDrGJ3Od2jOeXa3XOmO24Hg~0KGRO3LL5ZYCJ9S~EkcuqwD2BD8Z4BVpogRGqVgWO8SfgiVucSeS76zEcNoeM~F577JZwxNpWLGqNtWtN7fRBSLMIRhdHeTad44IRtNDKYhJHq9qF3OkBf45oiU02NfKDyEmBtakfNsopNygi-5x~i1PeYUEVj7jz2OJiLVkgdqH2G2Yaz4uJwm6-tN7a-i9eLemC0R0QgEsIBg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA)