COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Scale v1.1 - Pediatric Upper Extremity - Fine Motor, ADL
Abbreviation: Neuro-QoL Scale v1.1 - Pediatric Upper Extremity - Fine Motor, ADL
Points for Consideration:
Not recommended as potentially fit-for-purpose in a clinical trial
Description of Tool:
The Neuro-QoL Scale v1.1 - Pediatric Upper Extremity - Fine Motor, ADL scale is a PRO designed to measure upper extremity function in children aged 8-17 years with neurological conditions.
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: No degree requirement
Year: 2012
Objective of Development:
To monitor upper extremity function in children with neurological conditions who experience lifelong functional limitations
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
8-17 years (Epilepsy, Generic for Nervous System Diseases)
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Nervous System Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
COA type:
Number of Items 20 items
Mode of Administration:
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: Not reported
Response Scales: 5-point verbal rating scale ranging from 0 "Not able to do" to 4 "With No trouble"
Summary of Scoring:
Available Scores:
Global Score ranging from 0 to 100
Weighting:
No
Score Interpretation:
Higher score = Better self-reported health
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: Yes
Evidence of Instrument Review: Yes
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: Yes
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period:
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: Yes
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: Yes
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: Yes
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): Yes
Evidence of internal consistency:
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Lai JS (2015)
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): 0.94
Was a definition of stability applied to identify stable patients: No
Time frame or interval between the two administrations: 7 days
Population/Disease: Children with epilepsy; n= 59
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
Not applicable
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: Yes
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
Lai JS (2015)
Correlation coefficient used: Spearman's correlation coefficient
Measure: PedsQL Core, PedsQL Physical Functioning, PedsQL Psychosocial Health, PedsQL School Functioning, PedsQL Social Functioning
Results:
Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity and PedsQL Core, r= 0.41, p<0.01
Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity and PedsQL Psychosocial Health, r= 0.38, p< 0.01
Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity and PedsQL School Functioning, r= 0.30, p<0.05
Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity and PedsQL Social Functioning, r= 0.46, p<0.001
Population/Disease: Children with epilepsy; n= 59
Correlation coefficient used: Spearman's correlation coefficient
Measure: EQ-5D Index
Results: Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity and EQ-5D Index, r= 0.55, p< 0.001
Population/Disease: Children with epilepsy; n= 59
Correlation coefficient used: Spearman's correlation coefficient
Measure: PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale (MFS) General Fatigue
Results: Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QoL Upper Extremity and MFS General Fatigue, r= 0.31, p< 0.05
Population/Disease: Children with epilepsy; n= 59
Correlation coefficient used: Spearman's correlation coefficient
Measure: PROMIS Global Health T-Score
Results: Significant correlation was found between Neuro-QOL Lower Extremity (Mobility) and PROMIS Global Health T-Score r= 0.30, p<0.05
Population/Disease: Children with epilepsy; n= 59
Known-group validity:
Lai JS (2015)
Measure/Groups of patients: Patients taking anti-epilepsy drugs (AED) in moNotherapy (n= 39) and patients on polytherapy (n= 17)
A priori hypotheses: Not stated
Were hypotheses confirmed: Not applicable
Results: t-test
Patients on AED moNotherapy showed better Upper Extremity ratings than those on polytherapy (t= -2.12, p= 0.04)
Population/Disease: Patients on moNotherapy or polytherapy ; n= 55
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: Yes
Evidence of known-groups validity: Yes
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Evidence of responder thresholds: None identified
Reference(s) of development / validation
Cella D, Nowinski C, Peterman A. The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10 Suppl):S28-36. (https://www.archives-pmr.org/article/S0003-9993(11)00438-2/fulltext)
Lai JS, Nowinski C, Victorson D. Quality-of-Life Measures in Children with Neurological Conditions: Pediatric Neuro-Qol. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26(1), 36-47 (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1545968311412054)
Lai JS, Nowinski CJ, Zelko F. Validation of the Neuro-QoL measurement system in children with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2015 May;46:209-14 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458416/)
Other references
None identified
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Original language and translations
Original Language: English for the USA
Translations:
Polish
Norwegian
Italian
German
French
Czech
Spanish
References of translations
Lai JS , Nowinski CJ , Victorson D , Bode R , Podrabsky T , McKinney N , Straube D , Holmes GL , McDonald CM , Henricson E , Abresch RT , Moy C , Cella D
David Cella
Department of Medical Social Sciences
Northwestern University
Chicago
IlliNois
USA
E-mail: d-cella@Northwestern.edu
Contact:
Health Measures
E-mail: help@healthmeasures.net and/or translations@HealthMeasures.net
Condition of use: copyright
Review copy available on the Health Measures website (https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/neuro-qol/obtain-and-administer-measures)
Review copy
None identified