COA At-a-Glance
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population
Evidence of internal consistency
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability
Evidence of concurrent validity
Evidence of known-groups validity
Evidence of ability to detect change over time
Evidence of responder thresholds
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Overview
- Content Validity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Ability to Detect Change
- Responder Thresholds
- Reference(s) of development / validation
- Other references
- Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
- Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
- Original language and translations
- References of translations
- Authors and contact information
- Condition of use: copyright
- Website
- Review copy
Overview
Instrument Name: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Version 2
Abbreviation: PDMS-2
Description of Tool:
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales Version 2 is a ClinRO + PerfO developed to assess gross and fine motor skills in children from birth through five years of age. It is composed of 249 items covering the following domains:
Reflexes (Re) (8 items)
Stationary (St) (30 items)
Locomotion (Lo) (89 items)
Object Manipulation (Ob) (24 items)
Grasping (Gr) (26 items)
Visual-Motor Integration (Vi) (72 items)
Minimum Qualification Required by COA Administrator: MA or BA
Comment:
Adapted from the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale published in 1983
Year: 2000
Objective of Development:
To assess gross and fine motor skills in children from birth through five years of age
Population of Development: Age range (therapeutic indication):
0-71 months (Developmental Disabilities)
Validated with children on the autistic spectrum, with cerebral palsy, receiving physical therapy for various diagNoses, and premature children and babies
Pediatric Population(s) in which COA has been used:
Mental Disorders; Nervous System Diseases; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Cardiovascular Disease ; Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications; Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases; Eye Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Neoplasms; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Digestive System Diseases; Virus Diseases; Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Wounds and Injuries; Respiratory Tract Diseases
COA type:
Number of Items 249 tests (the number of tests administered is specific of each child, depending on the age and the level of development)
Mode of Administration:
Data Collection Mode:
Time for Completion: 45 to 60 minutes for the entire assessment. Approximately 20 to 30 minutes for gross motor or fine motor assessments, respectively.
Response Scales: 3-point verbal rating scale ranging from 0 "unable to perform", 1 "partial performance", 2 "correct performance"
Summary of Scoring:
Available scores:
3 composite scores (Sum of standard scores are presented as percentiles, standard scores, and age equivalents. Score ranges were not reported.)
Gross Motor Quotient
Fine Motor Quotient
Total Motor Quotient
Cut-Off score for children with or without fine motor: 16th percentile, child is considered to have fine motor problems
Cut-Off score at risk and pre-term infants: 16th percentile for gross motor skills in infants at the 4 month age level
Weighting:
No
Score Interpretation:
Higher score= Better developed motor abilities
Content Validity
Evidence of Literature Review: None identified
Evidence of Instrument Review: None identified
Evidence of Clinical or Expert Input: Yes
Evidence of concept elicitation in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of a Saturation Grid: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Data Collection Method: None identified
Recall/Observation Period:
Evidence for Selection of Reponse Options: None identified
Evidence of cognitive interviewing of draft instrument in target patient population: None identified
Evidence of Preliminary Scoring of Items and Domains: None identified
Evidence related to respondent and administrator burden: None identified
Evidence of a Conceptual Framework: None identified
Evidence of an item-tracking matrix: None identified
Evidence related to item selection: Yes
Evidence of re-testing the final version: None identified
Reliability
Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha): None identified
Test-retest Reliability (ICC):
Not applicable
Inter-rater/ inter-interviewer reliability (kappa):
None identified
Evidence of test-retest or inter-rater reliability: None identified
Validity
Concurrent validity (convergent, divergent):
None identified
Known-group validity:
None identified
Evidence of Translatability Assessment: None identified
Evidence related to missing data: None identified
Evidence for Selection of Recall Period: None identified
Evidence of Administration Instructions and Training Provided: None identified
Evidence of concurrent validity: None identified
Evidence of known-groups validity: None identified
Evidence of ability to detect change over time: None identified
Ability to Detect Change
Ability to detect change (Responsiveness):
None identified
Responder Thresholds
Responder Thresholds:
Wuang (2002)
- Population/Disease: Children with intellectual disabilities (n=141, aged 3-6 years)
- Method used: Anchor-based
- Results:
MDC: 7.6
MCID: 8.39
Evidence of responder thresholds: Yes
Reference(s) of development / validation
Folio MR, Fewell RR. PDMS-2 Peabody developmental motor scales second edition. Austin: PRO-ED Inc. 2000
Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody developmental motor scales and activity cards. DLM Teaching Resources; 1983
Other references
Wuang YP, Su CY, Huang MH. Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Jun;56(6):567-78
PubMed Abstract: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21988314/
Inclusion of the COA in product labelling
None identified
Existence of Scoring / Interpretation / User Manual
Original language and translations
Original: English
Translations:
Portuguese for Portugal
Portuguese for Brazil
References of translations
Brazilian:
Zanella LW, Valentini NC, Copetti F, Nobre GC. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Second Edition (PDMS-2): Reliability, content and construct validity evidence for Brazilian children. Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Apr;111:103871 (PubMed abstract)
Portuguese:
Saraiva L, Rodrigues LP, Cordovil R, Barreiros J. Motor profile of Portuguese preschool children on the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: a cross-cultural study. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jun;34(6):1966-73 (PubMed abstract)
Condition of use: copyright
Copyright:
Instrument copyrighted by Pearson Assessment
CoU:
*With fees for academic/Non profit research
*With fees for commercial/pharmaceutical companies
*With the signature of a contract/agreement
*Other: please visit Pearson websites UK (https://www.pearsonclinical.co.uk/AlliedHealth/PaediatricAssessments/Motor/PeabodyDevelopmentalMotorScalesSecondEdition(PDMS-2)/PeabodyDevelopmentalMotorScalesSecondEdition(PDMS-2).aspx) - USA (https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Motor-Sensory/Peabody-Developmental-Motor-Scales-%7C-Second-Edition/p/100000249.html)
Website
Pearson websites:
UK (https://www.pearsonclinical.co.uk/AlliedHealth/PaediatricAssessments/Motor/PeabodyDevelopmentalMotorScalesSecondEdition(PDMS-2)/PeabodyDevelopmentalMotorScalesSecondEdition(PDMS-2).aspx)
USA (https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Motor-Sensory/Peabody-Developmental-Motor-Scales-%7C-Second-Edition/p/100000249.html)
Review copy
Please contact Pearson Assessment, Inc.